Flow to Ethics: Navigating Sea Change in Public Discourse
Unveiling the Ethical Path: A Journey Through the Seasons of Life
The difference between what is and what ought to be refers to the gap or discrepancy between the current state of affairs and a desired or ideal state of affairs. This concept is often used in discussions of ethics or social justice, where questions of fairness and morality arise.
In Christian ethics, the idea of what ought to be is often derived from biblical teachings and principles. Christians may look to the Bible as a guide for how to live a moral and ethical life, and may seek to bring their own lives and society as a whole closer to what they believe to be God's will.
For example, the ethic in 2 Peter 1:5-7 is often the opposite of our natural reactions under pressure. Our base reactions can be more animalistic, such as instincts of fight or flight, aggressive posturing, gossip, backstabbing, and even suicidal or homicidal tendencies.
All seven virtues listed are templates of New Testament ethics, "flight plans," if you will, to keep us on the straight and narrow. These are intentional moves that bring us closer to the humanity God intends, as the Spirit enables.
We choose goodness, kindness, and beauty because we were originally created in the image of God.
Born free, we can now, in Christ, choose to live as free men, in the opposite spirit to the world. Hence, φιλαδελφεια (brotherly love) and the six other virtues listed in 2 Peter 1:5-7.
However, there can be disagreement among Christians about what exactly "ought to be" in a given situation. For example, some Christians may believe that certain actions, such as homosexuality or abortion, are inherently immoral, while others may see these issues as more complex and nuanced.
Regardless of these differences, the concept of the difference between what is and what ought to be remains central to Christian ethics and other discussions of morality and justice.